For nuværende er det mest ukrainere og russere der er i kødhakkemaskinen. Desværre ser det ud til at nogle mener at det er helt fint, og hvad der er endnu værre, at flere bør deltage i katastrofen.
Escobar: And It’s One, Two, Three; What Are We Fighting For? NATO’s Wars
All of you Vietnam vets and draft resisters will recognize where this column’s headline is coming from. Oh yes, this ain’t the late 1960s anymore, so it’s time to revamp it – no AI needed – and expand it: from now on, be assured everyone in the wild, wild West will be forced to fight and/or endure three overlapping NATO wars.
War number 1
It’s Europe v. Russia, of course. Not proxy anymore: hot ‘n nasty, direct. Considering the advanced rottenness of the whole Ukrainian front, new fronts are already proliferating: the South Caucasus; clandestine ops in the Baltic Sea; MI6 recruiting frenzy across Central Asia; fresh terrorism ahead in the Black Sea, especially Crimea.
…
Yet this ain’t 1914 or 1935; now nuclear weapons may come into play.
The Kremlin and Russia’s Security Council are very much aware of the high stakes. In his recent interview to Kommersant, Sergei Shoigu even rolled out some key NATO numbers to stress the threat Russia faces: over 50,000 tanks and armored vehicles; over 7,000 combat aircraft; over 750 warships; 350 military and civilian satellites; an immense offense (italics mine) budget.
Well, what sly Shoigu did not say is that when push comes to shove, it only takes Mr. Khinzal, Mr. Sarmat, Mr. Zircon and Mr. Oreshnik to deliver a few strategic business cards to paralyze the whole NATO machinery in a matter of minutes.
War number 2
It’s the Empire of Chaos v. Iran in West Asia, with Eretz Israel as much as proxy as a lead actor.
…
Using the Arabs against BRICS won’t cut it even with MbZ in the UAE and MbS in Saudi Arabia, who have both realized the business scam will only work if there is real peace in Gaza; some sort of humanitarian solution for the Palestinians; and rebuilding the Gaza strip.
The death cult in Tel Aviv will never allow any of the above: their plan is to kill them all, steall all their land, and eradicate their culture. And as the genocide goes on – totally legitimized by the NATO sphere – the death cult keeps bombing anything in sight, perpetrating the balkanization of Syria, and expanding Eretz Israel.
War number 3
It’s NATO against China. Already decided in the latest summit in The Hague, side by side with the continuing war on Russia.
Yet actually the scam is much bigger: it’s NATO’s war on BRICS.
That was announced, casually, by that unspeakable Dutch mediocrity that makes former slab of Norwegian wood Stoltenberg sound like a quantum physics star. NATO’s Secretary-General Rutti Frutti actually threatened India, China and Brazil directly, and ordered them to “call Putin” to prevent “Daddy” Trump from unleashing his next Tariff Temper Tantrum (TTT).
…
Meanwhile, in Europe, Tricontinental analysis has noted how the – warmongering – German BlackRock chancellor has pledged “€650 billion over the next five years toward military spending in order to reach the [NATO] 5% target by 2035”. That means Berlin being forced to raise “about €144 billion per year”, via, what else, austerity and debt, translated into massive extra taxes on German consumers.
That, in a nutshell, is the “program” for the whole, fragmented, collective West in the near future: austerity for everyone (except the 0.01%); and NATO Wars, not Diamonds, Forever.
En katastrofe der var helt og aldeles undgåelig – og jo længere den pågår, desto værre er det for ukrainere der kynisk bruges som kanonfoder af Nato-regimerne i bestræbelserne på at stække det russiske regime. Husk man kan godt have forståelse for, hvorfor det russiske regime reagerede med et overfald på naboen, uden at det indebærer accept eller støtte. Det var ikke uprovokeret. Men Nato-regimernes handlinger op til det russiske regimes overfald bør også fordømmes.
Og, nej en yderligere krigsskat eller 5%-af BNP på ‘forsvar’ er ikke den rigtige vej.
Er organisationen overhovedet værd at bevare, spørger Andrew Napolitano her:
“What do you think the Kremlin thinks when Trump makes these threats? 50 days, 10 days, 6 days or else?
I want to say with others, some of whom I’ve watched on your show, that it washes off their back like water off a duck. But I think I agree with that in the sense of the immediate remarks and the immediate effect. But I think they’re very worried.
I think from Modi to Xi Jinping to almost any leader in the world. And look to Ignacio de Silva Lula in Brazil for the things he’s doing right now. He’s a very astute man and he’s a good leader.
And he’s backing away almost wholesalely now from the United States, which is a monumental move for Brazil to do. But the reason he’s doing it is because like Putin, like Xi Jinping, like Modi, like other leaders in the world, with the possible exception of Europe, where brain dead people rule, they’re afraid because they know we are possessed still of residual power that can do them great harm, both economic and military. And they’re very worried.
And I think Putin and Xi Jinping are worried in that sense too, because they know we have 6,000 nuklear warheads”
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here:
Cookie Policy
